Analysis: The lack of collateral function makes Ethereum ETF relatively less attractive
London investment management company Farside Investors released a report stating, "We believe that the inflow of funds into Ethereum ETFs may be less than Bitcoin ETFs for the following reasons:
1. Bitcoin ETF was approved first, attracting more attention;
2. Before the approval of U.S. spot ETFs, the market size of Bitcoin's exchange-traded products (ETPs) was larger than Ethereum's;
3. The lack of staking function makes Ethereum ETF relatively less attractive;
4. Bitcoin has stronger relevance as a financial asset, while Ethereum focuses more on decentralized applications (dApps) and chain usage."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hashflow to Unlock HFTs Worth About $1.78 Million Today
New Android Malware SpyAgent Steals Private Keys, FBI Issues Warning
Shiba Inu: Shibarium Successfully Casts Over 140,000 NFT
Biden aide working on U.S. sovereign wealth fund proposal: person familiar with the matter